Auditing case study
Question-(01)
Apply Audit procedure, to obtain appropriate
audit evidence when the auditor is unable to be present at the Physical
inventory count due to unforeseen circumstances.
Ans:
If, the auditor is
unable to be present at the Physical inventory count due to unforeseen
circumstances. As per “BSA- 501” the
auditor should take or observe some physical counts on an alternative date and
when necessary, perform audit procedures on intervening transactions. Perform
alternative audit procedures to assess whether the changes in inventory between
the date of physical count and the period end date are correctly recorded.
Question-(02)
Apply Audit procedure, to obtain appropriate
audit evidence when the entity involves any Litigation and claim.
Ans:
As per “BSA-501” The auditor should carry out
audit procedures in order to become aware of any litigation and claims
involving the entity which may result in a material misstatement of the
financial statements. Such procedures should include-
01.
Make appropriate inquiries of management including
obtaining representations
02.
Review minutes of those
charged with governance and corresponding entities' legal counsel.
03.
Examine legal expense
amount
04.
The auditor should seek
direct communication with the entity's legal counsel.
05.
If the management
refuses to give the auditor permission to communicate with the entity's legal counsel, this would
be a scope limitation and should ordinarily lead to a qualified opinion or a
disclaimer of the pinion.
Question-(03) (ISA-510 opening balances)
Apply Audit procedure, to obtain
appropriate audit evidence when the financial
Statements are audited for the first time or when the financial
statements for
The Prior period were audited by another auditor.
Ans:
For initial
audit engagements, the auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence concerning the opening balances that:
(a) The opening balances do not contain
misstatements that materially affect the current period’s financial statements;
(b) The prior period’s closing balances
have been correctly brought forward to the current period or, when appropriate,
have been restated; and
(c) Appropriate accounting policies are
consistently applied or changes in accounting policies have been appropriately
accounted for and adequately presented and disclosed.
Audit Procedures
The sufficiency and appropriateness of the audit evidence the auditor
will need
To obtain regarding opening balances depend on such matters as the
Following:
01. The accounting policies followed by the entity.
02. Whether the prior period’s financial statements were audited, and if so
whether the auditor’s report was modified.
03. The nature of the accounts and the risk of material misstatement in the
Current period’s financial statements.
04. The materiality of the opening balances relative to the current period’s
financial statements.
When the prior period’s financial statements were audited by another auditor, the current auditor may be able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding opening balances by reviewing the predecessor auditor’s working papers. In these circumstances, the current auditor would also consider the professional competence and independence of the predecessor auditor. If the prior period’s auditor’s report was modified, the auditor would pay particular attention in the current period to the matter which resulted in the modification.
Question-(04) (ISA-540 –Accounting estimate)
Audit procedures for Accounting Estimates
Ans:-
When the accounting
estimate involved material misstatement in the financial statements, the
auditor procedures include-
01. The auditor should
design and perform further audit procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence, so as to entity’s accounting estimates are reasonable in the
circumstances.
02. Review and test the
process used by management to develop the estimate.
03. Review subsequent
events which provide audit evidence of the reasonableness of estimates.
04. Evaluation of the
data and consideration of assumptions on which the estimate is based.
05. Testing of the
calculations involved in the accounting estimate.
06. Consideration of
management’s approval procedures
07. Compare of previous estimate with the actual results.
Question-(05)
Audit
procedures for going concern assumptions/or Risk assessment procedures
Ans_
In obtaining an
understanding of the entity, the auditor should consider whether there are any events or conditions related to going
concern or business risk have
been identified which may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concerns in
performing audit procedures throughout the audit.
The auditor should-
01. Review management
plans for future action based on its going concern assessment.
02. Gather sufficient
appropriate audit evidence to confirm or dispel whether or not a material
uncertainty exist.
03. Insure that adequate
disclosure is made in the financial statements.
04. If that adequate
disclosure is made in the financial statements, the auditor should express an
unqualified audit opinion
05. If that adequate
disclosure is not made in the financial statements, the auditor should express
“a qualified or adverse audit opinion”
Question-(06)
Audit
Procedures for obtaining Audit evidence
The auditor obtains
audit evidence to draw a reasonable conclusions on which to base the audit
opinion by performing audit procedures to-
01. Obtain and understanding
of the entity and its environment, including its internal control, to assessed
the risk of material misstatement at the financial statement and assertion
level.
02. Inspection of records
or documents
03. Inspection of tangible assets
04. Observation
05. Inquiry
06. Confirmation
07. Recalculation
08. Re performance
09. Analytical procedures
10. Substantive procedure
Question-(07)
Audit
Procedures for non-compliance
Finding
When the auditor becomes
aware of information concerning the effect of noncompliance in the financial
statements, the auditor should findings the documents and discusses them with
the management. If the management does not provide satisfactory information
that it is in fact incompliance, the auditor would consult with the entities
lawyer about the application of the laws & regulation to the circumstances.
Reporting of noncompliance
The auditor should as
soon as possible either communicate with those charged with governance, and
finding sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding noncompliance that
comes to the auditor attention. If the auditor suspects that members of senior
management, including the member of the board of directors are involved in
noncompliance, the auditor should report the matter to the next higher level of
authority at the entity.
Question-(08)
Audit Procedures for related party’s
transactions
01. Performing details
tests of transactions and balances
02. Reviewing minutes of
meeting of shareholders and those charged with governance
03. Reviewing accounting
records for large or unusual transactions or balances
04. Reviewing
confirmations of loan receivables and payable
05. Reviewing investment transactions, for example purchase or sale of an equity interest in a joint venture or other entity.
Question-(09)
Audit Procedures for disagreement of opening
balances
Ans:
Regarding all opening g balances
01. Check prior year
closing balances have been correctly brought forward, or
02. Where appropriate
restated
03. Consider impact of
current year work on opening balances (eg bad debts write off in current year
compare to opening provision).
04. Review management
working papers, accounting & internal control system for prior year.
05. Decide whether
opening balances need amendment.
Question-(10)
Management
responsibility against fraud
IAS-240, set out management is the primary responsible for the prevention
& detection of fraud rests with both those charge with governance of the
entity and with management.
Question-(11)
Auditors responsibility against fraud
01. The auditor must
obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statement taken as a whole, are
free from material misstatement caused by fraud or error.
When the auditors become
aware of suspected or actual frauds or instances of non-compliance which should
be reported to the relevant authority, they should:
01. Report to the
management
02. Report to those
charged with governance
03. Report to the regulatory and enforcement authority, where appropriate.
Question-(12)
Audit Procedures
Responsive to the Risk of Material Misstatement of the Entity’s Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures.
Ans:
The auditor should design and perform further audit procedures in response to assessed risks of material misstatement of assertions relating to the entity’s fair value measurements and disclosures. ISA 330, “The Auditor’s Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks” discusses the auditor’s Responsibility to design and perform further audit procedures whose nature, Timing and extent are responsive to the assessed risk of material misstatement at the assertion level. Such further audit procedures include tests of control and substantive procedures, as appropriate. Paragraphs 34-55 below provide additional specific guidance on substantive Procedures that may be relevant in the context of the entity’s fair value measurements and disclosures
Question-(13)
Audit Procedures
for related parties transaction and Disclosures.
Ans:
The auditor should review information provided by those charged with
Governance and management identifying the names of all known related parties and should perform the following audit procedures in respect of the completeness of this information:
(a) Review prior year working papers for names of known related
Parties;
(b) Review the entity’s procedures for identification of related parties;
(c) Inquire as to the affiliation of those charged with governance and
Officers with other entities;
(d) Review shareholder records to determine the names of principal
Shareholders or, if appropriate, obtain a listing of principal
shareholders
From the share register;
(e) Review minutes of the meetings of shareholders and those charged
With governance and other relevant statutory records such as the
Register of directors’ interests;
(f) Inquire of other auditors currently involved in the audit, (g) Review
the entity’s income tax returns and other information Supplied to regulatory
agencies.
If, in the auditor’s judgment, there is a lower risk of significant
related
Parties remaining undetected, these procedures may be modified as
Appropriate.
Where the applicable financial reporting framework requires disclosure
Of related party relationships, the auditor should be satisfied that the Disclosure is adequate.
Question-(14) (ISA-701)
Factors that may have influenced the auditor’s risk assessment, for as per) (ISA-701)
Ans:
The auditor shall determine which of the matters communicated with those charged with governance are the key audit matters.
01.High estimation uncertainty.
02. Economic conditions that affected the auditor’s ability to obtain
audit evidence, for example illiquid markets for certain financial instruments.
03. New or emerging accounting policies, for example
entity-specific or industry-specific matters on which the engagement team
consulted within the firm.
04. Changes in the entity’s strategy or business model that had a material effect on the financial statements.
Question-(15) (ISA-560) (Subsewuent Events)
What are the audit procedures When, after the date of the auditor’s report but before the date the financial Statements are issued, the auditor becomes aware of a fact which may materially affect the financial statements.
Ans:
The auditor should consider
Whether the financial statements need amendment,
should discuss the
Matter with management, and should take the action appropriate in the Circumstances.
Question-(16) (ISA-560) (Subsequent Events)
What are the audit procedures when management does not amend the financial statements in Circumstances?
Ans:
When management does not amend the financial statements in Circumstances where the auditor believes they need to be amended and the auditor’s report has not been released to the entity, the auditor should express a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion, as described in ISA 701, “Modifications to the Independent Auditor’s Report.
Question-(17) (ISA-560) (Subsequent Events)
Facts discovered after the
Financial Statements have been issued
Ans:
After
the financial statements have been issued, the auditor has no obligation to
Make
any inquiry regarding such financial statements. When, after the financial statements have been
issued, the auditor becomes Aware of a fact which existed
at the date of the auditor’s report and which, If known
at that date, may have caused the auditor to modify the auditor’s Report,
the auditor should consider whether the financial statements need
Revision, should discuss the matter with management,
and should take the
Action
appropriate in the circumstances
Question-(18) (ISA-570) (Going concern)
Audit Procedures when events or Conditions
have been identified regarding Going concern
Ans:
If
events or conditions have been identified that may cast significant doubt on
the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, the auditor shall obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence to determine whether or not a material
uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast
Significant doubt on the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern.
Under this situation audit
procedures includes-
(a)
Where management has not yet performed an assessment of the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern, requesting management to make its assessment.
(b) Evaluating management’s plans for future actions in relation to its going concern assessment, whether the outcome of these plans is likely to improve the situation and whether management’s plans are feasible in the circumstances. (Ref: Para. A17)
(c)
Where the entity has prepared a cash flow forecast, and analysis of the
forecast is significant factor in considering the future outcome of events or
conditions in the evaluation of management’s plans for future actions: (Ref:
Para. A18–A19)
(i) Evaluating the reliability of the underlying data generated to prepare the forecast; and
(ii) Determining whether there is adequate support for the assumptions underlying the forecast.
(d) Considering whether any additional facts or information have become available since the date on which management made its assessment.
(e) Requesting written representations from management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, regarding their plans for future actions and the feasibility of these plans. (Ref: Para. A20)
Question-(19) (ISA-570) (Going concern)
Audit opinion
procedures as per going concern assumption
Ans:
01. If adequate disclosure is made
in the financial statements, the auditor should express an unqualified opinion
but modified the auditor report by adding an emphasis of matter paragraph that
highlights the existence of a material uncertainty relating to the event or
condition that may cast significant doubt on the entities ability to continue
as a going concern.
02. If adequate disclosure is not
made in the financial statements, the auditor should express a qualified or
adverse opinion, as appropriate (“ISA-701, modification to the in depended
auditor report”)
Question-(20) (ISA-265) (Internal control)
Audit
procedures of Whether Deficiencies in Internal Control Have Been
Identified (Ref: Para. 7)
Ans:
In determining whether the
auditor has identified one or more deficiencies in
Internal control, the auditor may
discuss the relevant facts and circumstances of
The auditor’s findings with the appropriate level of management. This discussion provides an opportunity for the auditor to alert management on a timely basis to the existence of deficiencies of which management may not have been previously aware. The level of management with whom it is appropriate to discuss the findings is one that is familiar with the internal control area concerned and that has the authority to take remedial action on any identified deficiencies in internal control. In some circumstances, it may not be appropriate for the auditor to discuss the auditor’s findings directly with management, for example, if the findings appear to call management’s integrity or competence into question (see paragraph A20).
Question-(21) (ISA-710)
(“Comparative Information Corresponding Figures)
Audit procedures when auditor concludes that a material misstatement exists that affect the prior period financial statements.
Ans:
If
the auditor concludes that a material misstatement exists that affects the
prior
Period
financial statements on which the predecessor auditor had previously reported
without modification, the auditor shall communicate the misstatement
With
the appropriate level of management and, unless all of those charged with
Governance
is involved in managing the entity, 6 those charged with governance
And
request that the predecessor auditor be informed. If the prior period financial
Statements are amended, and the predecessor auditor agrees to issue a new auditor’s report on the amended financial statements of the prior period, the auditor shall report only on the current period. (Ref: Para. A11)
Question-(22)
(ISA-710) (“Comparative Information Corresponding Figures”)
Audit procedures when Prior Period Financial Statements Not Audited
Ans:
If
the prior period financial statements were not audited, the auditor shall state
in
an
Other Matter paragraph that the comparative financial statements are unaudited.
Such a statement does not, however, relieve the auditor of the requirement to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the opening balances do not contain
misstatements that materially affect the current period’s financial statements
Question-(23) (ISA-705) (Modified audit
opinion)
Circumstances When a
Modification to the Auditor’s Opinion Is Required
Ans:
The auditor shall modify the
opinion in the auditor’s report when:
(a) The auditor concludes that,
based on the audit evidence obtained, the financial statements as a whole are
not free from material misstatement; or (Ref: Para. A2–A7)
(b) The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement. (Ref: Para. A8–A12)
Question-(24) (ISA-705) (Modified audit
opinion)
Determining the Type
of Modification to the Auditor’s Opinion
Ans:
Qualified Opinion
The auditor shall express a qualified opinion when:
(a) The auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in the aggregate, are material, but not pervasive, to the financial statements; or
(b) The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion, but the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be material but not pervasive.
Adverse Opinion
The auditor shall express an adverse opinion when the auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in the aggregate, are both material and pervasive to the financial statements.
Disclaimer of Opinion
The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when the
auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to
base the opinion, and the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the
financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be both
material and pervasive.
The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when, in extremely rare
circumstances involving multiple uncertainties, the auditor concludes that,
notwithstanding having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding
each of the individual uncertainties, it is not possible to form an opinion on
the financial statements due to the potential interaction of the uncertainties
and their possible cumulative effect on the financial statements